The argument of my article "Don't Buy Nike" is that people shouldn't buy Nike because the owners are treating their employees like trash and they aren't being fair and throwing shoes at the workers. The evidence is being told in the article by saying they are underpaying the minimum wage to the workers. The issue I think is completely unfair because the workers are putting their hard work into making the shoes and doing what they're told but the owners don't "appreciate" how much they're working in the sweatshop. What I found surprising is that the owners are throwing shoes at the workers and don't care if they get hurt.
The argument in this poem "Sweatshops" is that the girl was doing the same thing over and over again and she felt tired of it. In the poem it said "I work, I work, I work endlessly-" and so I thought that she was doing the same thing again. It was kinda different cause the poem seemed past tense. Back then people drank wine and ate bread when fed. The form of meaning helped me understand the poem by saying "Im just a machine!". The owners look like they just use advantage of them.
Your analysis of the Nike article was good, but I am confused about the second poem. Which poem are you writing about? It seems like you combined the two.
ReplyDelete